Supreme Court Decision Confounds Common Sense

Published February 1, 2013

The prosecuting attorney and the single female justice in a recent Supreme Court case involving sexual assault disagree strongly with the opinion of the other justices. Trigger warning: sexual assault details are included in this article.
The case in question saw four people – three men and one woman – accused of forcing their way into the home of a young woman in Hafnarfjörður in December 2011. The woman was physically assaulted by the group, among other ways, by having a a finger forcefully inserted into her anus and vagina against her will. Police charged the perpetrators of the act with sexual assault.
Amazingly, the four of the five Supreme Court justices – all of them male – ruled that this particular part of the attack was not sexual assault. The reason they gave was that the assault was not meant to achieve sexual gratification, but rather to “only” physically hurt the victim.
The only female justice on the case, Ingibjörg Benediktsdóttir, wrote a dissenting opinion. She referred to Article 194 of the Icelandic General Penal Code, which states: “Anyone who by means of violence or threats of violence forces a person to have carnal intercourse or other sexual intimacy shall be subject to imprisonment for no less than 1 year and up to 16 years. Violence is considered to include the deprivation of independence by means of confinement, pharmaceuticals or in other comparable ways.” The definition as such, she argued, it does not matter if the perpetrators were trying to gratify themselves sexually or not – the victim was sexually assaulted and humiliated by the ordeal.
Hulda Elsa Björgvinsdóttir, the prosecuting attorney in the case, agreed with Ingibjörg, saying that the court speculating on the thoughts of the perpetrator, rather than what the criminal act entailed, sets a bad precedent. She added that the matter was clearly a case of sexual torture.
Acquitted in the highest court in the country, the perpetrators cannot be tried again for the sexual assault charge. They were all, however, sentenced to prison for physical assault.



News
Foreigners Reportedly Responsible For Increased Pork Consumption

Foreigners Reportedly Responsible For Increased Pork Consumption

by

The most likely explanation for the swift increase of pork consumption in Iceland: foreigners, supposedly. Kjarninn reports that pork consumption

News
Human Rights Office Supports Shorter Work Week

Human Rights Office Supports Shorter Work Week

by

The Icelandic Human Rights Centre (IHRC) is in favour of shortening the full-time work day from eight hours to seven,

News
PM Learned Of US Navy Plans From The News

PM Learned Of US Navy Plans From The News

by

Prime Minister Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson says he welcomes increased US Navy activity in Iceland, and first learned about their plans

News
Falcon Destroys And Eats Starling – VIDEO

Falcon Destroys And Eats Starling – VIDEO

by

The bird of prey was photographed and filmed making short work of a common starling. Þórarinn Einarsson was in the

News
Zuists Run Into Legal Snag

Zuists Run Into Legal Snag

by

The new religion is having trouble getting itself registered, which has temporarily puts it “parish fee” refunds on hold. “We’ve

News
Icelandic Children Greet Refugee Classmate With Arabic Song

Icelandic Children Greet Refugee Classmate With Arabic Song

by

To greet a new classmate from Syria, a group of Icelandic children learned how to sing in Arabic. The performance

Show Me More!