Supreme Court Decision Confounds Common Sense

Published February 1, 2013

The prosecuting attorney and the single female justice in a recent Supreme Court case involving sexual assault disagree strongly with the opinion of the other justices. Trigger warning: sexual assault details are included in this article.
The case in question saw four people – three men and one woman – accused of forcing their way into the home of a young woman in Hafnarfjörður in December 2011. The woman was physically assaulted by the group, among other ways, by having a a finger forcefully inserted into her anus and vagina against her will. Police charged the perpetrators of the act with sexual assault.
Amazingly, the four of the five Supreme Court justices – all of them male – ruled that this particular part of the attack was not sexual assault. The reason they gave was that the assault was not meant to achieve sexual gratification, but rather to “only” physically hurt the victim.
The only female justice on the case, Ingibjörg Benediktsdóttir, wrote a dissenting opinion. She referred to Article 194 of the Icelandic General Penal Code, which states: “Anyone who by means of violence or threats of violence forces a person to have carnal intercourse or other sexual intimacy shall be subject to imprisonment for no less than 1 year and up to 16 years. Violence is considered to include the deprivation of independence by means of confinement, pharmaceuticals or in other comparable ways.” The definition as such, she argued, it does not matter if the perpetrators were trying to gratify themselves sexually or not – the victim was sexually assaulted and humiliated by the ordeal.
Hulda Elsa Björgvinsdóttir, the prosecuting attorney in the case, agreed with Ingibjörg, saying that the court speculating on the thoughts of the perpetrator, rather than what the criminal act entailed, sets a bad precedent. She added that the matter was clearly a case of sexual torture.
Acquitted in the highest court in the country, the perpetrators cannot be tried again for the sexual assault charge. They were all, however, sentenced to prison for physical assault.



News
“Did I Advance? No, Unfortunately Not”

“Did I Advance? No, Unfortunately Not”

by

Despite her best efforts, Iceland’s Eurovision contestant María Ólafsdóttir did not advance through yesterday’s semi-finals with her song “Unbroken.” This

News
Bird-Flipping Bus Driver Still A Mystery

Bird-Flipping Bus Driver Still A Mystery

by

The bus driver who has repeatedly given Finance Minister Bjarni Benediktsson the finger has not been identified, nor has the

News
Police Can Do Little To Stop “Skutlarar”

Police Can Do Little To Stop “Skutlarar”

by

There is not much the police can do to stop people from offering to give other people rides in exchange

News
Skólavörðustígur To Become Giant Waterslide

Skólavörðustígur To Become Giant Waterslide

by

The downtown street of Skólavörðustígur will have its continuous slope put to better use this July, when it is temporarily

News
Director Translates Funny At The Icelandic Documentary Film Festival

Director Translates Funny At The Icelandic Documentary Film Festival

by and

Director Ragnar Hansson has always been fascinated by stand-up comedy. He’s a filmmaker who’s worked with, and written, comedy for

News
Progressive MP Projectile Vomited At The Pentagon, Plot Thickens

Progressive MP Projectile Vomited At The Pentagon, Plot Thickens

by

The curious case of the projectile vomiting MP continues to develop, with conflicting stories of his health coming from fellow

Show Me More!